Hiring in Medical Devices

• R&D engineering

  Mechanical engineers · Electrical engineers · Firmware engineers · Software-in-device engineers

• Regulatory & quality

  Regulatory affairs (medical devices) · Quality engineers · Clinical safety officers

• Clinical & post-market

  Clinical affairs leads · Post-market surveillance specialists

• Commercial

  Product managers · Field-based clinical specialists · KAMs

• Class and pathway

  510(k), De Novo, PMA and CE marking under MDR/IVDR reward different signal. Pathway captured at intake.

• R&D specialisation

  Mechanical, electrical, firmware and software-in-devices are distinct crafts — separated in scoring.

• QMS and design controls

  ISO 13485 and design-control ownership surfaced from the CV.

• Software-in-device convergence

  As devices become connected, firmware and cybersecurity expectations now sit alongside mechanical and electrical engineering — rubrics capture both.

Every candidate is scored against the role's rubric, and every score points back to a specific line in the CV. For medical devices, these are the signals that carry weight:

• Class and pathway captured
• QMS evidence from CV
• R&D specialisation separated

• RAC
• ASQ CQE
• Notified-body audit history

• MDR / IVDR
• FDA 21 CFR 820
• ISO 13485

1. A ranked set of candidates, each with a score and the evidence behind it.
2. Eligibility checks resolved before the candidate reaches you — right to work, credentials, location model.
3. Salary expectation against your band, stated plainly, before you invest interview time.
4. One decision per candidate: advance, hold or decline, reversible for a short window.

Candidates stay invisible to you until we've reviewed them for your specific role, and contact details are released as a separate step.